![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
snagged from
lar_laughs
I'm not very unique D: Wary of trusting strangers probably fits though :D And which entry did it pick to analyse, I wonder?
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
So, meridian-rose, your LiveJournal reveals…
You are… 1% unique, 12% peculiar, 41% interesting, 30% normal and 17% herdlike (partly because you, like everyone else, enjoy writing). When it comes to friends you are normal. In terms of the way you relate to people, you are wary of trusting strangers. Your writing style (based on a recent public entry) is overcomplicated.
Your overall weirdness is: 35
(The average level of weirdness is: 28.
You are weirder than 74% of other LJers.)
I'm not very unique D: Wary of trusting strangers probably fits though :D And which entry did it pick to analyse, I wonder?
no subject
Date: 2011-06-07 02:22 pm (UTC)I am 0% unique, 14% peculiar, 50% interesting, 23% normal and 14% herdlike (partly because you, like everyone else, enjoy travel). When it comes to friends you are normal. In terms of the way you relate to people, you are keen to please. Your writing style (based upon a recent public entry) is intellectual
I only have about 30 entries, so there's not much to go on, but kind of fun and interesting.
no subject
Date: 2011-06-07 03:14 pm (UTC)I think all the percentages are based on your interest list, so common interests make you more herdlike and less common interests make you more unique.
The rest of the stuff is based on, what I can make out, public recent entries. And like the 750words site, that's a highly subjective analysis. I think if we both ran this meme again next month, with different entries in our journals but no changes to our interest list, the percentages would stay the same but the friends/relate/style would change :D
no subject
Date: 2011-06-07 03:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-07 04:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-07 09:39 pm (UTC)