2013-10-27

meridian_rose: pen on letter background  with text  saying 'writer' (Default)
2013-10-27 09:33 am

Asexual Awareness Week – day seven

I started a day late so I'm finishing a day late. There'll be one more final thoughts post later or tomorrow.

Day seven – visibility and representation

There are not that many examples of asexual characters, though the One Of Us tag on the One% world gives both fictional examples and mentions real people.

The major – ie mainstream - examples of asexual people tend to be the Doctor (Dr Who), Sheldon Cooper (The Big Bang Theory) and Sherlock (Sherlock, BBC). They are all interesting characters in their own right. However there are significant problems with holding them up as asexual role models or examples:

They're all white
They're all men, despite the fact that more women readily identify as asexual (which might be due to social pressure on men to have sex as previously discussed) – please excuse my use of gender binary in this example
They're all "othered" in multiple ways – one is an alien, one is often read by reviewers as someone with Asperger's, and Sherlock says he isn't a psychopath but "a high functioning sociopath" (a label disagreed with often, including here which is interesting because it points out that 'sexual promiscuity and numerous short-term relationships' are traits prevalent in a sociopathic person.)
They all fit the 'purity' myth to some degree; Sheldon won't even drink coffee because it's a drug, the Doctor doesn't drink alcohol, Sherlock's only vice is smoking and he's working on giving it up
They're all geniuses - it ties in with the purity myth, "I don't drink I don't want to damage my precious wonderful snowflake brain cells" – and so spend a lot of time talking down to those around them who are just too stupid to understand. The Doctor doesn't always dumb things down, but he does sometimes treat companions like young children – ah, they're so imaginative but so naïve!
They do not use the label for themselves

There are lesser known characters such as New Zealand's Shortland Street's Gerald, still a white male, but one who discovers and accepts asexuality as an orientation and the right label for him. Poppy from a show called Huge is a rare female using the label for herself.

The TV Tropes page on asexuality has a list of examples from all media forms though some are questionable (Sherlock, again). It's interesting that this page has a more tolerant and sympathetic view of asexuality than many mainstream news outlets, clearly stating that "It should be noted that asexuals are not incapable of sex or falling in love. Asexuality is often the lack of sexual attraction rather than sex drive or emotional attraction. As such, asexuals who are more indifferent to sex rather than actively averse to it may be quite capable of sex and masturbation (though this is not usually directed at any object of desire) if they need to. Asexuals in romantic relationships with sexual individuals, for example, may have no problem having intercourse with their partners for the sake of said relationship even if the act itself may not have the same significance or appeal as it would to sexual individuals. Unlike the aforementioned fully sexual individuals, asexuals do not actively desire said sexual actions and will not miss said acts at all if denied to them" and
"It is unfortunately common for some people to express cynicism towards the idea of asexuality, or to insist that it is simply impossible for two people to have a close, platonic relationship where sex is not involved."

It also mentions the much maligned episode of House where he (himself a fanfic version of Sherlock named House rather than Holmes, crotchety genius) is proven right that anyone who doesn't want sex is sick or lying. This is the sort of visibility asexual people do not need. There's enough bias from culture and religion telling us we're broken.

Outside the Mainstream

What about fanfic? It's common to queer characters and unfortunately it's still common practice to erase queerness, especially bisexuality. Asexuals rarely get a mention, though there seems to be a fair amount of Avengers fic dealing with the issue. However most asexual characters find themselves having sex with their love interest, otherwise it's not a real relationship, right? /sarcasm/

This post talks about fanfic, including the spectrum of asexuality and the "dearth of ace fics" featuring anyone who isn't a white cis man. It goes on to say that in many of the fics they have read, an asexual person ("Sam") develops a relationship with a sexually active person ("Jo") and:
"in 90% (not a scientific statistic) of fics I have read, is that sooner or later Sam and Jo will end up in bed together. Sam will realise that sex is important to Joe. So Sam, because they love Jo just that much, will go about bringing Jo sexual pleasure, and Sam will enjoy doing this because Jo is enjoying it.
Then they will cuddle and everything will be fine.
Cut to me, clicking out of the fic, feeling utterly dispirited. I thought that maybe this time the fic wouldn’t fall into the narrative that romantic relationships must, in some way, include sex in order to be legitimate. That the asexual character wasn’t required, in some way, to compromise on their identity.
Often in the fic they aren’t doing this, by the way. In fics as written, the asexual character is totally happy with this arrangement. In real life, many asexuals are in sexual relationships and they are happy and fulfilled - some asexuals, whilst they don’t experience sexual attraction, do have libidos and can experience sexual desire. The problem isn’t with this narrative by itself. The problem is when this is the dominant representation of asexual relationships in fandom." [emboldening mine]

It's certainly something I struggle with. I'm far more interested in writing and reading non-sexual aspects of intimacy but I still don't write many asexual characters. I do have one in particular and I do want her to explore sex up to a point – not to engage in PIV sex, however, the only sex that counts for most people. It's difficult to try and show the spectrum of romantic and sexual attraction without potentially being told "they're not asexual they're just frigid" or "no asexual would behave like that".

One more link on fiction: Asexual Lesbians/ Asexual Women in Fiction.
meridian_rose: pen on letter background  with text  saying 'writer' (Default)
2013-10-27 04:46 pm

Asexual Awarness Week Final Thoughts

Thanks to everyone who read my asexual awareness posts and took away the messages I was trying to give. I wanted to bust some of the myths about asexuality and talk about relationships and representation and I wanted to give links to articles of interest, including further reading.

I had some wonderful supportive comments for which I'm very appreciative. Some of you have learnt things or found links of interest and that's fantastic to hear :D
However I had issues at the DW version the posts. Despite my best attempts to draw from particularly good literature on the subject, some people still can't accept that asexuality isn't just celibacy. They claim that asexuality is just too complicated to grasp. Worst of all was the comment about the article on relationships. I quoted from an article on the word "zucchini" which shows it was a word adopted by the asexual community themselves (therefore not a slur), something to describe a deeply committed but non-sexual relationship, and the takeaway was that "zucchini is a vegetable…comatose people are vegetables…maybe asexual people are emotionally numb" [ie vegetables].

Are people really so wilfully ignorant? So obtuse they can't grasp the difference between wanting to have sex but not and not wanting to have sex at all? Suggesting that asexual people are emotionally stunted so we call ourselves vegetables? I just can't.



I shouldn't complain. It could be worse. SwankIvy, well known in asexual circles, and about to have a book on asexuality published under her birth name of Julia Decker, got featured in UK tabloid The Daily Mail. Instead of interviewing her, they grabbed an old photo of her in a bikini from her facebook page and misquoted and misrepresented her statements from other interviews and past papers. This has led to unwanted attention and harassment on her author page at facebook from assholes who want to marry her and "turn her straight" amongst more messages.

So this is why we need asexual awareness week. It's why we still need Gay Pride. Until ignorance is abolished and people stop judging on the basis of sexual attraction, we need both spaces to exist without criticism and outreach to educate people. In the meantime, I'm grateful to all of you who embrace and accept all forms of sexual orientation as valid ♥